Shared results on 5950X stock and 7950X stock. Screenshot for the latter below:
Not sure why the benchmark is not seeing my full 64gb RAM in the new 7950x build...
Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Moderator: MOD_Command
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
- Attachments
-
- 2022-12-04_15-32-02.png (219.28 KiB) Viewed 1384 times
-
DmitriyBlade
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:22 pm
- Location: Russia
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
- Screenshot 2022-12-09 191636.jpg (152.81 KiB) Viewed 1257 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
- i7-12700K.png (25.9 KiB) Viewed 1224 times
-
DmitriyBlade
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:22 pm
- Location: Russia
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
My results. Final scores are a little bit faster than the scores shown here with the benchmark still running. I'm not sure if any overclocking is taking place so I'll need to check that.
- benchmark.png (95.65 KiB) Viewed 1140 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Showing all virtual cores. Scores are better because this time I waited for the benchmark to complete before taking the screenshot. Also I haven't done any kind of cleanup for running tasks.
- benchmark-2.png (94.94 KiB) Viewed 1137 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
To expand on my results. It IS overclocked but only mildly: 50x ALL-CORE for performance cores and 40x all-core on efficiency cores. Either my motherboard doesn't do well with overclocking or I just got unlucky in the silicon roulette. I used to be able to push 51x-47x at first but now trying that results in POST failure.
Also it's interesting how the 7950 results posted by others are so close to the 12700 even though they are very different architectures. That sort of suggests to me that the game engine isn't fully optimized.
Also it's interesting how the 7950 results posted by others are so close to the 12700 even though they are very different architectures. That sort of suggests to me that the game engine isn't fully optimized.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
- 20230902 - CMO Laptop Benchmark.jpg (59.17 KiB) Viewed 929 times
Specs:
CMO 1307.3
Windows 11 Home 64 Bit
CPU - I5-8300H (2.3 GHz)
RAM - 16GB (for some reason, CMO only says 8GB)
GPU - GTX 1050TI
Drive - Samsung 860 1TB SSD
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
My new build PC
i5-13600K (using MSI Lite load 6)
2x8 GB DDR4 @ 2133 (I've yet to run XMP/OC profiles)
MSI Z790-P DDR4 Wifi
I just wanna see the results and I'm pretty happy with where my CPU is sitting with others in the sheet.
i5-13600K (using MSI Lite load 6)
2x8 GB DDR4 @ 2133 (I've yet to run XMP/OC profiles)
MSI Z790-P DDR4 Wifi
- cmo1.PNG (15.72 KiB) Viewed 875 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
I've been curious on how the 13 series intels will perform. I have an i9-13950HX PC on the way in a couple weeks. It'll be interesting to see how it compares to my current 12. I'm always a little skeptical that there is a big difference in intel generations. But so far the 12 and 13s seem to be doing well.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Reran the benchmark with the CPU at lite load 4 and then increased my memory to 2666. It seems that I'm unlucky when it comes to memory OC'ing so my RAM pairing is quite suboptimal.
Additional bits: I'm using an ID Cooling SE-226-XT aRGB and 3x 140mm intake fans with 1x outtake (default fans for Lancool III). With my settings above, I peaked at around 76C and CPU package power peaked at 106W.
- Screenshot (14) (2).png (259.17 KiB) Viewed 828 times
It's doing very well. From the initial reviews I'm seeing, the 13950HX seems to perform similarly to the 13600K (which matches the 12700K). So I guess you're seeing what your performance would be my benchmarks now heh. May I ask what laptop you're getting?thewood1 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:41 pm I've been curious on how the 13 series intels will perform. I have an i9-13950HX PC on the way in a couple weeks. It'll be interesting to see how it compares to my current 12. I'm always a little skeptical that there is a big difference in intel generations. But so far the 12 and 13s seem to be doing well.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Like Rain08, I've also gone for a 13600K on my new build. It seems like anything better than that is probably a little overkill for gaming alone. While I'm keeping my GPU, (1080TI), everything else will be an upgrade - 32GB of DDR5 RAM, a Z790 motherboard, M2 SSD etc. According to CPU Benchmark site, the 13600K should be circa 60-80% faster than my old I7 6700K so I'm looking forward to seeing how large CMO scenarios run on it.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
I am getting the GT77 Titan with the i9 and the 4090. My work subsidizes almost all of it and replaces it once a year. My old gets passed on to someone else.
I'm currently using the 2022 version with the 12900HX.
As you can see in previous posts, the benchmark is pretty good. My expectation is the 13 series will be slightly faster. I have noticed that 1307.3 seems to run a little slower than 1291.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 5#p5049625
This is my 1307.3 run...
The runs average right around there.
I'm currently using the 2022 version with the 12900HX.
As you can see in previous posts, the benchmark is pretty good. My expectation is the 13 series will be slightly faster. I have noticed that 1307.3 seems to run a little slower than 1291.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 5#p5049625
This is my 1307.3 run...
- Screenshot 2023-02-11 214045.jpg (59.85 KiB) Viewed 793 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Ryzen 9 5950X 3.4 Ghz
64 GB DDR3600
Windows 10 64 bit Enterprise LTSC
1307.3
64 GB DDR3600
Windows 10 64 bit Enterprise LTSC
1307.3
- Benchmark Result.PNG (30.59 KiB) Viewed 716 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Got a new 17" laptop with an i9-13980HX. The second thing I did with it after uninstalling Norton...
- Screenshot 2023-02-18 105627.png (36.36 KiB) Viewed 632 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Well my PC is around 10 years old, so I thought I would benchmark it for data. I will be getting a new one soon. This was with a fresh install of CMO.
EDIT - that was SO bad that I wanted to see if it repeated. It did not, still sucks but better.
TEST#2
TEST #1
EDIT - that was SO bad that I wanted to see if it repeated. It did not, still sucks but better.
TEST#2
TEST #1
But By Grace Go I.......
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Ok New Laptop...
New Benchmarks.
Test #1 - 1307.1
Test #2 1307.3
Yeah, this was a good upgrade. I will reinstall all the addons and then give her a whirl. I have more setting up to do though, but yeah it is WAY faster now.
I will look into TACVIEW as well.
New Benchmarks.
Test #1 - 1307.1
Test #2 1307.3
Yeah, this was a good upgrade. I will reinstall all the addons and then give her a whirl. I have more setting up to do though, but yeah it is WAY faster now.
I will look into TACVIEW as well.
But By Grace Go I.......
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
After installing tacview, the GPU was 100%. So I tried it without GPU.
The MSI turned it on anyway. That makes me think the intel graphics would have had issues.
The MSI turned it on anyway. That makes me think the intel graphics would have had issues.
But By Grace Go I.......
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
I figured I'd throw in some old hardware here. Do I win the "Slowest System" award. LOL 
Incidentally, I have 16 gigs of DDR3 1333 RAM. Not sure what's up with the 0 RAM thing.
Incidentally, I have 16 gigs of DDR3 1333 RAM. Not sure what's up with the 0 RAM thing.
- Attachments
-
- CMO Benchmark.png (88.28 KiB) Viewed 377 times